DAVIS v. WILLIAMS


17 Misc.2d 888 (1959)

Robert Davis et al., Respondents, v. Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Anthony Tedesco, Respondent, v. Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Robert E. Wilson, Respondent, v. Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.) Anthony Tedesco, Respondent, v. Robert Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 4.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

April 9, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Held, Telchin & Held (Edward F. Doran, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Wilfrid E. Marrin for respondents in Actions No. 3 and No. 4.

No one appearing for respondents in Actions No. 1 and No. 2.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BENJAMIN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to appellant, and motion to consolidate granted, without costs. Respondents failed to show that consolidation would prejudice a substantial right. (Shea v. Benjamin, 275 App. Div. 1003; Kelly v. John Vogel, Inc., 279 App. Div. 797; Tammany v. Bloom, 5 A.D.2d 996...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases