1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 169 Cal.App.2d
  5. 169 Cal.App.2d 735 (1959)
 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO v. CONSOLIDATED FARMS, INC.

Docket No. 18209.

169 Cal.App.2d 735 (1959)

337 P.2d 840

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FARMS, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 21, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith C. Sorenson, District Attorney, and Howard E. Gawthrop, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.

Wagstaffe, Daba & Hulse for Respondents.

BRAY, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

QUESTION PRESENTED

Were defendants operating a commercial hog ranch within the meaning of an ordinance defining such ranch?

FACTS

San Mateo County Ordinance Number 568 (codified in San Mateo County Ordinance Code, § 5560.1, div. V, pt. Two, ch. 7) provides: "Commercial hog ranch shall mean any premises where more than forty (40) head of swine are maintained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases