1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 267 F.2d
  5. 267 F.2d 633 (1959)
 

WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRADE v. McLAUGHLIN

No. 14625.

267 F.2d 633 (1959)

WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRADE, Eckington Building Supply Co., Monaghan-Randels, Inc., Cafe Burgundy, Inc., Robert R. Swarthout, Appellants, v. Robert E. McLAUGHLIN, David B. Karrick, Col. A. C. Welling, Clement F. Preller, and Thomas W. Brahany, As Members of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, and James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 12, 1959.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 17, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leonard J. Calhoun and Fred M. Vinson, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Seth H. Dubin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, and Louis Mackall, Jr., Atty., District Unemployment Compensation Board, were on the brief, for appellees.

Messrs. Joseph Notes and John A. Weil, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellees Robert E. McLaughlin, et al., as Members of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied April 17, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought in the District Court by various employers within the District of Columbia (1) to declare invalid an agreement made between the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board and the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the Temporary Unemployment Compensation Act of 1958,1 and (2) to enjoin the Unemployment Compensation Board from receiving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases