Per Curiam.
Defendant subtenant was under no liability either at common law or by reason of its status as a statutory subtenant to remove plaintiff sublessor's abandoned property from the premises. The removal of the equipment, moreover, was unnecessary for the protection of the subtenant's possession. In the circumstances any expense incurred by the subtenant in removing the property may not be offset against the plaintiff's claim for rent.
The order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
