BARLOW v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AM.


17 Misc.2d 864 (1959)

Michael Barlow, an Infant, by Blanche Barlow, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Le Vine & Schechter (Merwin F. Le Vine and Ferdinand M. Schwartz of counsel), for appellant.

Benjamin N. Brody and Solomon Millendorf for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The court below was in error in charging the jury that section 341 of the Civil Practice Act placed the burden on the defendant insurance company to come forward with evidence to rebut the presumption of death because of the insured's seven years' absence. The "due proof" required as a condition precedent to an insured's liability upon a policy of life insurance is not met by relying upon the presumption and by casting upon the insurer the burden...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases