BLUMENFELD v. EICHENBAUM


7 Wis.2d 1 (1959)

BLUMENFELD, Respondent, v. EICHENBAUM, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 7, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Hersh & Magidson of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Arthur Magidson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Rubin, Ruppa & Wegner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa.


DIETERICH, J.

We have reviewed the testimony and evidence submitted in this case. In a trial to the court findings of fact will not be set aside on appeal unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Swazee v. Lee (1951), 259 Wis. 136, 137, 47 N.W.2d 733; Lerner v. Lerner (1948), 252 Wis. 87, 31 N.W.2d 208; Ische v. Ische (1948)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases