1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 17 Misc.2d
  5. 17 Misc.2d 862 (1959)
 

MULLER v. HOLTZER

17 Misc.2d 862 (1959)

Herman Muller et al., Copartners Doing Business as Milligan, Muller & Company, Appellants, v. Henry Holtzer et al., Doing Business as John E. Cahill & Company, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chamberlin, Kafer, Wilds & Jube (John M. Johnston and Macdonald Flinn of counsel), for appellants.

Irwin Isaacs for respondents.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Testimony of hardship that might be suffered by the tenants-respondents was clearly inadmissible and prejudicial to the landlords-appellants. The landlords comply with the statute's demands if they bring the eviction proceeding with the honest intention and desire to obtain possession of the business space for their own immediate and personal use (Matter of Rosenbluth v. Finkelstein,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases