PER CURIAM.
Appellee sued in replevin to recover possession of two trucks. It based its claim on the fact that appellant had purchased a 1956 truck under a conditional sales contract and as collateral security for this purchase gave appellee a chattel mortgage on his 1953 truck and that appellant had defaulted in his payment on the purchase price of the 1956 truck. Appellant defended on the ground that he had never signed
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.