MATLOCK v. NEW HYDE PARK FIRE DIST.


20 Misc.2d 851 (1959)

Agnes Matlock, Plaintiff, v. New Hyde Park Fire District et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

December 18, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hicks & Corliss for New Hyde Park Fire District, defendant.

Martin L. Baron for plaintiff.

Gostkowski & Hampton for Garden City Park Fire District, defendant.


FRED J. MUNDER, J.

This is a motion by the defendant, New Hyde Park Fire District, under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The action is one to recover damages for the willful failure of the members of the fire departments in the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases