1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 688 (1959)
 

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. v. PUROFIED DOWN, ETC.

176 F.Supp. 688 (1959)

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Petitioner v. PUROFIED DOWN PRODUCTS CORP., Louis Puro and Joseph Puro, Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 9, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rogers, Hoge & Hills, New York City, for petitioner. William F. Weigel, New York City, of counsel.

Arthur N. Field, New York City, for respondents.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Petitioner, E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co. moved this court under Rule 12 of the Civil Rules of the Southern District of New York for an order adjudging respondents, Purofied Down Products Corp., its president, Louis Puro, and its vice-president, Joseph Puro, in contempt of a consent decree entered on November 4, 1957. Petitioner also moved under Rule 7(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases