The contention in petitioner's brief that he was not, as the statute requires, "placed under arrest" before the request for a test was made, was not argued but the evidence is clear that the arrest preceded the request. Upon such arrest petitioner was taken to a division station house and he there refused a request to submit to the test. While there, he asked permission to use a telephone. He does not dispute a patrolman's testimony, first, that the desk sergeant told him...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
