1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 54 Wn.2d
  5. 54 Wn.2d 792 (1959)
 

MUELLER v. SEEFRIED

No. 34766.

54 Wn.2d 792 (1959)

345 P.2d 389

F.C. MUELLER, Appellant, v. HAROLD SEEFRIED et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

October 29, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank C. Mueller, Jr., for appellant.

Robbins, Oseran & Robbins, for respondents.

DONWORTH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action for a brokerage commission, entered after the trial court sustained defendants' challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence at the close of plaintiff's case.

[1] The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury. In this posture of the case we are required to view plaintiff's evidence in its most favorable light to determine whether there was sufficient evidence or reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases