STATE v. BILL


146 Conn. 693 (1959)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD N. BILL

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Krug, with whom was John W. Joy, for the appellant (defendant).

Francis F. McGuire, special prosecuting attorney, with whom was Edward C. Hamill, prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

BALDWIN, C. J., MURPHY, MELLITZ and SHEA, Js.


MURPHY, J.

The defendant was found guilty of the crime of indecent exposure in a trial to the court and has appealed. He claims that the state did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was insufficient to warrant conviction, and that the state failed to sustain the burden of proof as to the alibi he offered. These claims raise but one question: On all the evidence, was the defendant guilty beyond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases