G. EDGAR HARR SONS v. NEWTON

[No. 38, September Term, 1959.]

220 Md. 618 (1959)

155 A.2d 480

G. EDGAR HARR SONS v. NEWTON ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 19, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin W. Brizendine for the appellant.

William F. Mosner, with whom were Power & Mosner on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal raises a narrow question as to the sufficiency of a notice of intention to file a mechanic's lien. The suit was instituted as a special case by consent under Maryland Rule 329. Pursuant to Code (1957), Art. 63, sec. 29, a surety bond was substituted for the lien, and it was agreed that if the Court should find sufficient notice of intent to claim a lien, judgment might be entered against the surety, otherwise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases