1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 171 F.Supp.
  5. 171 F.Supp. 661 (1959)
 

GOTTESMAN v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

171 F.Supp. 661 (1959)

Rita GOTTESMAN, Maria Mattiello, Arlyne Zucker and Paul J. Peyser, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 23, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Netter & Netter, New York City, Gen. Counsel for plaintiffs, Henry L. Bayles, Edward A. Rothenberg, New York City, of counsel.

Henry M. Hogan, George A. Brooks, New York City, for defendant General Motors Corp., Edward B. Wallace, New York City, of counsel.

Charles A. Horsky, Washington, D. C., Frank H. Gordon, New York City, for defendant, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1957, 353 U.S. 586, 77 S.Ct. 872, 1 L.Ed.2d 1057, three actions by stockholders of General Motors were commenced in this court against General Motors and du Pont. They were consolidated and an amended consolidated complaint was filed.

It states eleven claims. The first six seek triple damages against du Pont...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases