PER CURIAM.
The defendant urges three grounds for reversal: (1) the judge's refusal to charge upon the plaintiff's alleged contributory negligence; (2) a lack of proof of causal relationship between an overriding turn of the up-and-down cable on its drum and the accident; and (3) a failure to charge the jury that the plaintiff was being compensated under New York Workmen's Compensation Law, § 1 et seq., and would have to reimburse
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.