HENRY v. TARPLEY

No. 5-1935.

324 S.W.2d 503 (1959)

E. A. HENRY, William Laubach, et al., Appellants, v. W. G. TARPLEY, Marion Ward and H. H. Harris, individually, as taxpayers and as representatives of a class, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Frank Holt, Prosecuting Attorney, and John Jernigan, Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Little Rock, for appellants.

Gerald T. Ridgeway, Little Rock, Catlett & Henderson, Amici Curiae, Little Rock, Mehaffy, Smith & Williams, Amici Curiae, Little Rock, for appellees.


HOLT, Justice.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of Act 107 of the 1959 Legislature. On a hearing, the trial court held the Act unconstitutional on two grounds: (1) that it violates Amendment No. 40 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas and, (2) that it also violates Amendment No. 14 for the reason that it was special and local in its effect.

Since we have concluded that the Act clearly, we think, violates Amendment 40 on two grounds, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases