1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 74 (1959)
 

SUPREME CONSTRUCTION CO. v. OLYMPIC RECREATION

7 Wis.2d 74 (1959)

SUPREME CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. OLYMPIC RECREATION, INC., Defendant and Respondent: CHRISTIFULLI and another, Copartners, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 7, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Carl H. Juergens of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Gerald J. Rice of Milwaukee.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Appellants Christifulli make no express claim that the findings of the court are not sustained by the evidence. Their specific challenges are that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to allow appellants to amend their complaint to allege a cause of action for the unjust enrichment of Olympic and they further claim that the trial court should have allowed a new trial.

We have, however, reviewed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases