STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. RICE


326 S.W.2d 490 (1959)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. William K. RICE, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

June 5, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spears, Moore, Rebman & Williams, Chattanooga, for plaintiff in error.

Massey, Stone & Kirkland, Chattanooga, for defendant in error.


SWEPSTON, Justice.

The sole determinative question is the proper interpretation of an exclusionary clause in a public liability automobile insurance policy.

The case was tried on a stipulation of facts and a judgment rendered below in favor of William K. Rice against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as in the trial court as plaintiff and defendant respectively.

The two assignments of error are:

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases