WHITE v. OSTLY

Docket No. 18526.

173 Cal.App.2d 636 (1959)

343 P.2d 937

THOMAS P. WHITE et al., Appellants, v. HAROLD J. OSTLY, as County Clerk, etc., Respondent; JOHN G. OPPENHEIMER, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 14, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Edward M. Belasco, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel (Los Angeles), and Joel R. Bennett, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

John G. Oppenheimer, in pro. per., for Real Party in Interest.


TOBRINER, J.

Appellants' contention here that the county clerk must enter in the judgment book a "Judgment of Dismissal" rendered after the court granted a motion to dismiss, with directions to the attorney to prepare the order, cannot be sustained in the face of section 581d of the Code of Civil Procedure, the desirability of simplicity of procedure, the legislative intent, and the practical considerations involved.

Appellants here are defendants in the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases