PRUDENTI v. NASH


19 Misc.2d 781 (1959)

Michael J. Prudenti, Respondent, v. Catherine L. Nash, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

September 25, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry S. Finch for appellant.

Robert Swaybill and Benjamin Schwartz for respondent.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§ 1410 et seq.) do not authorize the maintenance of summary proceedings against the life tenant herein. (Matter of Bigelow, 67 Misc. 545; see, also, Real Property Law, § 33.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Final order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases