CLOPINE v. KEMPER

No. 18418.

344 P.2d 451 (1959)

Mervin CLOPINE, Ellen E. Clopine and Hazel I. Kemper, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Arthur J. KEMPER, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

September 28, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. E. Hendricks, Julesburg, for plaintiffs in error.

Anthony J. Pasquale, Donald W. Marshall, Denver, for defendant in error.


KNAUSS, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to as the Clopines and Hazel Kemper. Defendant in error, defendant in the trial court, will be referred to as defendant, or as Arthur Kemper.

The action was brought by the Clopines under Rule 105, R.C.P.Colo., to obtain an adjudication of the rights of all parties with respect to certain real estate title to which the Clopines allegedly acquired by deed from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases