1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 19 Misc.2d
  5. 19 Misc.2d 770 (1959)
 

STEINHILBER v. CHALLENGER STEEL PRODS.

19 Misc.2d 770 (1959)

Fred G. Steinhilber et al., Doing Business as Hamilton Specialty Company, Plaintiffs, v. Challenger Steel Products Corp., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

April 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee Franklin for defendant.

Block & Greene (Morris Block of counsel), for plaintiffs.

FRANK A. GULOTTA, J.

This motion to dismiss a complaint as insufficient in law, presents a question not often encountered.

It is a suit on a contract which, although drafted by the defendant on its own letterhead and purports to be a binding agreement for three years, the defendant contends is unenforcible, because it lacks mutuality.

In other words, he says, even though you prepare an agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases