1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 177 F.Supp.
  5. 177 F.Supp. 611 (1959)
 

HOLT HOWARD ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GOLDMAN

177 F.Supp. 611 (1959)

HOLT HOWARD ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Victor GOLDMAN and David Menschik, a partnership, d/b/a Menschik-Goldman Company, and E. J. Korvette, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 16, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amster & Levy, New York City, for plaintiff. Morton Amster, New York City, of counsel.

Blum, Moscovitz, Friedman & Blum, New York City, for defendants Victor Goldman and David Menschik. Richard W. Blum, New York City, Martin J. Beran, New York City, on the brief.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Defendants Victor Goldman and David Menschik, d/b/a Menschik-Goldman Company, move for an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein and further, upon movants' counterclaim, enjoining "plaintiff, its agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons in active concert and participation with them, from interfering in any manner with the importation and sale by defendants Victor Goldman and David Menschik of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases