MILLER v. HAND FORD SALES, INC.


216 Or. 567 (1959)

340 P.2d 181

MILLER v. HAND FORD SALES, INC.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions June 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl G. Helm, La Grande, argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellant.

Charles R. Cater, La Grande, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ross E. Hearing, La Grande.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, WARNER, PERRY, CRAWFORD and MILLARD, Justices.


REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries.

It is conceded by the parties that plaintiff's cause of action is based upon the theory of the defendant's breach of warranty arising out of a bailment.

The cause was tried before a jury and the result was a verdict for the defendant. On motion of plaintiff, the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases