1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 216 Or.
  5. 216 Or. 562 (1959)
 

WELLS v. LEWIS ET AL

216 Or. 562 (1959)

339 P.2d 430

WELLS v. LEWIS ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified May 20, 1959.

Petition for rehearing denied June 3, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Abraham, Hood River, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

Lamar Tooze, Portland, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant Herbert D. Lewis. On the brief was John F. Cushman, Hood River.

Teunis J. Wyers, Hood River, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent and cross-appellant Oscar Stenberg.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, WARNER, PERRY, CRAWFORD and MILLARD, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decree in a partnership accounting, wherein the plaintiff, Dr. Wells, appeals and the defendants, Doctors Lewis and Stenberg, cross-appeal from the decree.

The parties are doctors engaged in the practice of medicine at Hood River, Oregon. From April 15, 1947, to July 1, 1950, Doctors Lewis and Wells were co-partners. On the last date a new partnership was formed which included the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases