Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
There was no proof that respondent's method of manufacture was negligent or improper, and there was insufficient evidence that respondent failed to use due care in testing the wheel after the manufacture thereof to require submission of the evidence to the jury (see, e.g., Kalinowski v. Ryerson & Son, 242 App. Div. 43, affd. 270 N.Y. 532; Welsh v. Cornell, 168 N.Y. 508; Matter of Case, 214 N.Y....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.