BOLLENBACH v. BYSSHE


23 Misc.2d 53 (1959)

Chester Bollenbach, Suing on His Own Behalf and in the Right and for the Benefit of Camden Forge Company, and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of Camden Forge Company, Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Arthur E. Bysshe et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

October 27, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Cromwell for Arthur E. Bysshe and another, defendants.

Robert Bloom for Camden Forge Company, defendant.

Irving Steinman for Virgil D. Dardi, defendant.

Weinstein & Levinson for United Dye & Chemical Corporation, defendant.

Louis Kipnis for plaintiff.


OWEN McGIVERN, J.

Defendants Arthur E. Bysshe and William F. Fitzgerald, 2 of 16 defendants joined in a stockholders' derivative action, move this court for an order directing the entry of a judgment dismissing the complaint and action as against them, pursuant to section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice, by reason of plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Issue was joined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases