1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 355 Mich.
  5. 355 Mich. 406 (1959)
 

SCHURMAN v. CITY OF HOLLAND

Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 48,031.

355 Mich. 406 (1959)

94 N.W.2d 808

SCHURMAN v. CITY OF HOLLAND.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Rehearing denied April 13, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo W. Hoffman and Frederick D. McDonald, for plaintiffs.

James E. Townsend, for defendant City of Holland.

Ten Cate & Townsend, for individual defendants.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs' bill attacks certain annexation proceedings, same having been pursued to elective conclusion under authority of sections 6 and 13 of the so-called home-rule act, PA 1909, No 279, as last amended, respectively, by PA 1957, No 210 and PA 1956, No 77 (CL 1948, § 117.6, as amended, CLS 1956, § 117.13 [Stat Ann 1957 Cum Supp §§ 5.2085, 5.2092]). The bill was dismissed below on motion of defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases