1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 6 Wis.2d
  5. 6 Wis.2d 69 (1959)
 

WINTERSBERGER v. PIONEER IRON & METAL CO.

6 Wis.2d 69 (1959)

WINTERSBERGER, Respondent, v. PIONEER IRON & METAL COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Alan M. Clack of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Clack.

For the respondent there was a brief by Anderson & Murphy of Milwaukee, and oral argument by J. Stewart Murphy.

HALLOWS, J.

The appellant's first contention is that a lack of evidence in support of a jury's answer does not constitute a basis for changing the answer by the court and urges the correct rule is stated in Blohowak v. Grochoski (1903), 199 Wis. 189, 96 N. W. 551, to the effect that to change the jury's answer in the verdict the finding must be contrary to the undisputed credible evidence. This form of stating the rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases