CARLISLE, Judge.
1. The evidence as to the guilt of the defendant in this case was wholly circumstantial. Accordingly, it was error, as complained of in the special ground of the motion for new trial, for the trial court to fail to charge the principle embodied in Code § 38-109 as to what amount of evidence is required to authorize conviction on circumstantial evidence. Culver v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.