Per Curiam.
In this action for salary and breach of contract by a salesman against his employer, the plaintiff's testimony is not only contrary to experience but it contradicts itself and the examination before trial. Certain inconsistencies were sought to be explained by suggestive questions on redirect examination and resulted in incredible claims. We do not seek to explain how the jury arrived at a verdict giving credit to every part of this testimony. But...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
