KRYSIAK v. ACME WIRE COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 33622.

169 F.Supp. 576 (1959)

Louise KRYSIAK, Complainant, v. ACME WIRE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 13, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison, Spangenberg & Hull, Cleveland, Ohio, Oliver W. Hasenflue, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, Arthur F. Zalud and Wm. G. Batchelder, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for defendant.


McNAMEE, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a new trial complaining of the action of the Court in entering judgment for defendant at the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence. It is plaintiff's position that the evidence offered on her behalf presented a case that ought to have been submitted to the jury either under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur or on the theory that plaintiff had made out a prima facie case of circumstantial evidence of negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases