Order affirmed, with costs.
No opinion.
Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to dismiss the proceeding, with the following memorandum:
The application was denied upon the ground that the proposed new location was not "part of a modern shopping center, but propinquous thereto" and would violate appellant's general policy against the location of retail liquor stores in the vicinity of modern shopping centers. The Special...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
