PER CURIAM.
Appellant Ware has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment awarding $896.90 to appellee Burchett on an alleged oral contract for hauling a drilling rig.
Admittedly Burchett had a valid claim against either appellant Ware or appellee Daniel. The latter had a contract to drill a well for Ware. The drilling rig belonged to Daniel, but he testified that Ware agreed to pay his expenses, which included Burchett's bill.
Many grounds for reversal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
