PER CURIAM.
Appellant Ware has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment awarding $896.90 to appellee Burchett on an alleged oral contract for hauling a drilling rig.
Admittedly Burchett had a valid claim against either appellant Ware or appellee Daniel. The latter had a contract to drill a well for Ware. The drilling rig belonged to Daniel, but he testified that Ware agreed to pay his expenses, which included Burchett's bill.
Many grounds for reversal...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.