OPINION BY ERVIN, J., March 18, 1959:
This is an unemployment compensation case in which the sole issue is whether the claimant is guilty of wilful misconduct within the meaning of that term as used in § 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS § 802(e), if, after numerous warnings, he is discharged for being habitually late. The Bureau of Employment Security found the claimant ineligible to receive benefits. The referee reversed the bureau's decision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.