1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 9 A.D.2d
  5. 9 A.D.2d 695 (1959)
 

STEINHILBER v. CHALLENGER STEEL PRODS. CORP.

9 A.D.2d 695 (1959)

Fred G. Steinhilber et al., Doing Business as Hamilton Specialty Company, Appellants, v. Challenger Steel Products Corp., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 26, 1959

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Respondent, if so advised, may serve its answer within 10 days after the entry of the order hereon. The contract as pleaded does not lack mutuality. It is instinct with an obligation on the part of appellants to make a reasonable effort to sell the products of respondent, with price and other essential terms to be determined by the manufacturer (Wood v. Duff-Gordon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases