PAXTON v. MISIUK


54 N.J. Super. 15 (1959)

148 A.2d 217

CHARLES PAXTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE MISIUK, DEFENDANT, AND HENRY MISIUK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 20, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Marcus and Levy, attorneys; Mr. Chashin, of counsel).

Mr. Andrew V. Clark argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Richard D. Porter, attorney; Mr. Clark, of counsel).

Before Judges SCHETTINO, HALL and GAULKIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for respondent entered in the Law Division on a jury verdict of no cause for action. He sued the Misiuks for injuries said to have been sustained when the Misiuk car, owned by George and driven by Henry, in which he was a passenger, ran into a telephone pole. The action against George was voluntarily dismissed after the opening statements and thereafter the case continued against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases