DI CARLO v. GUTTMAN


9 A.D.2d 684 (1959)

Louis Di Carlo et al., Appellants, v. Shirley Guttman, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 13, 1959


Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

The notice of examination was untimely for failure to comply with our special rule (Rules App. Div. [2d Dept.], special rule, eff. Jan. 15, 1957) and for failure to explain the delay. However, appellants' request to examine the adverse parties before trial long after they filed their statement of readiness was also untimely. The discretion exercised in favor of appellants in granting them the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases