HORNELL BROAD. v. NIELSEN CO.


8 A.D.2d 60 (1959)

Hornell Broadcasting Corporation, Respondent, v. A. C. Nielsen Company et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

May 13, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shults & Shults (John J. Horey and William A. Argentieri of counsel), for Ra-Tel Broadcasters, Inc., appellant.

Coudert Brothers (Larrabee M. Johnson, Carleton E. Eldridge, Jr., and Joseph A. McManus of counsel), for A. C. Nielsen Company, appellant.

Albert E. Hollis and William J. Holbrook for respondent.

Present — McCURN, P. J., KIMBALL, BASTOW, GOLDMAN and HALPERN, JJ.


GOLDMAN, J.

This is an appeal from Special Term's denial of defendants' motions to dismiss the amended complaint or in the alternative to require plaintiff to separately state and number. Plaintiff pleads three causes of action growing out of an alleged libel by the defendants. In the first cause of action plaintiff claims injury to its business, loss of advertising accounts and inability to sell advertising time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases