1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 23 Misc.2d
  5. 23 Misc.2d 664 (1959)
 

MTR. OF DANIMAN v. BD. OF EDUC. N. Y. C.

23 Misc.2d 664 (1959)

In the Matter of Mary I. Daniman et al., Petitioners, v. Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

July 8, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Witt & Cammer for Mary I. Daniman and others, petitioners.

London, Simpson & London for Harry Slochower, petitioner.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel, for respondent.

LOUIS L. FRIEDMAN, J.

In this article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding, one Blau moves for an order relieving him from the terms of a stipulation, and further asks that the stipulation be vacated insofar as it applies to him.

By cross motion, respondent moves for an order denying the present application and directing that an order heretofore entered in this proceeding be resettled so as to provide that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases