PER CURIAM.
The point presented in this interlocutory appeal is that the trial court erred by entering an order denying plaintiffs' "motion for leave to amend and bring in additional party". It now appears, from an appeal lodged in this court in a subsequent cause involving the same property, that the plaintiffs made their own opportunity for amendment by filing a new suit and adding the additional party in question as a party-defendant in the new suit.
As...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
