1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 167 Cal.App.2d
  5. 167 Cal.App.2d 510 (1959)
 

AMES v. CITY OF PASADENA

Docket No. 23175.

167 Cal.App.2d 510 (1959)

334 P.2d 653

THOMAS W. AMES et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF PASADENA et al., Respondents; MARCIA PURPUS, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robertson & Poindexter and William M. Poindexter for Appellants.

Frank L. Kostlan, City Attorney, Wendell R. Thompson, Assistant City Attorney, and David E. Golay, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

Hahn & Hahn and Allyn H. Barber for Real Party in Interest.

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.*

The Board of Directors of the City of Pasadena upon appeal affirmed the action of the zoning committee in granting to the defendant Purpus a variance and exception from certain provisions of the city zoning ordinance. The variance and exception so granted permitted the defendant Purpus, in addition to a single family dwelling and garage, to construct a swimming pool...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases