1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 168 Ohio
  5. 168 Ohio St. 495 (1959)
 

ALEXANDER v. TOLEDO

No. 35781.

168 Ohio St. 495 (1959)

ALEXANDER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF TOLEDO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 11, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Eastman, Stichter & Smith, Mr. Jamille G. Jamra and Mr. Raymond L. Crawford, for appellants. Mr. Charles T. Lawton, director of law, and Mr. Robert Dorrell, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The question, the answer to which is determinative of this case, is whether the words, "for municipal purposes only, but not for school purposes," appearing in the caption of the ballot were unauthorized and thus invalidated the election. This court is of the opinion that the quoted words were unauthorized in the light of Section 3505.06, Revised Code, and that their use in the ballot invalidated the election.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases