1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 219 Or.
  5. 219 Or. 440 (1959)
 

BEARDSLEY v. HILL

219 Or. 440 (1959)

348 P.2d 58

BEARDSLEY v. HILL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed December 23, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James K. Buell, Portland, argued the cause for the appellant. With him on the brief were Phillips, Coughlin, Buell & Phillips, Portland.

James O. Goodwin, Oregon City, argued the cause for the respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur B. Baines, Portland, and Glenn R. Jack, Oregon City.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN and KING, Justices.

REVERSED.

SLOAN, J.

This was an action for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict for defendant; judgment was entered accordingly. The trial court allowed plaintiff's motion for a new trial and defendant appeals from that order. The assignments challenge the allowance of the order on the merits and also present the issue that the order allowing the new trial was not filed within fifty-five days. (ORS 17.615) We have concluded that the order was not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases