1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 219 Md.
  5. 219 Md. 440 (1959)
 

LEIMBACH v. NICHOLSON

[No. 114, September Term, 1958.]

219 Md. 440 (1959)

149 A.2d 411

LEIMBACH ET UX. v. NICHOLSON (Two Appeals in One Record)

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing filed and denied April 16, 1959.

Dissenting Opinion filed March 31, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Hamilton Whiteford, with whom were Due, Nickerson, Whiteford & Taylor on the brief, for the appellants.

W. Lee Harrison, with whom was Richard C. Murray on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case the plaintiff, appellee, brought an action in one declaration against two sets of defendants. The claim against Mark E. and Beatrice R. Gann was based on an alleged tortious interference with a contract between Nicholson and the Leimbachs. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case the trial court granted the motion of these defendants for a verdict in their favor, and there was no appeal from the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases