LE MERE v. LE MERE


6 Wis.2d 58 (1959)

LE MERE, Respondent, v. LE MERE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Welsh, Trowbridge, Bills, Planert & Gould of Green Bay, and oral argument by Fred N. Trowbridge.

For the respondent there was a brief by David, Soquet & Cherney of Green Bay, and oral argument by Colburn G. Cherney.


WINGERT, J.

Appellants contend (1) that Mrs. Le Mere's negligence with respect to lookout was a cause of the accident as a matter of law, and that therefore the trial court erred in refusing to change the negative answer to the causation question and grant a new trial for the apportionment of negligence; and (2) that the trial court erred in refusing to submit questions as to whether or not the defendant was negligent in proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases