1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 56 N.J.
  5. 56 N.J. Super. 589 (1959)
 

STATE v. SPERRY & HUTCHINSON CO.

56 N.J. Super. 589 (1959)

153 A.2d 691

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE SPERRY & HUTCHINSON COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 20, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Elmer J. Bennett argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Mr. Milton A. Dauber, of counsel).

Mr. Donald B. Kipp argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward, attorneys; Messrs. Kipp and Robert P. Hazlehurst, Jr., and Mr. Samuel M. Lane of the New York Bar, on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by the State of New Jersey from the dismissal by the Chancery Division of two complaints brought under the escheat laws. Both actions are against the same defendant and involve virtually the same questions of fact and of law. Consequently, they were consolidated for trial below and the appeals are also consolidated here.

Each suit seeks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases