VILL. OF WOODRIDGE v. PROYECT


18 Misc.2d 623 (1959)

Village of Woodridge, Landlord, v. Max Proyect et al., Tenants.

County Court, Sullivan County.

June 29, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Temes for landlord.

Gerstman & Gerstman (Alfred Gerstman of counsel), for tenants.


LAWRENCE H. COOKE, J.

In this summary proceeding tenants move to dismiss the petition and precept upon the ground that the petition is insufficient in law in that it "does not properly or sufficiently describe the real property which is the subject to this proceeding" and in that the petition "does not allege that any notice to vacate was given to respondent Faye Proyect".

The petition indicates that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases