Plaintiff had the burden of proving by competent evidence not only the negligence of defendant, but a causal connection between the blasting and the damages.
Plaintiff's witness, admittedly not an expert, was not qualified to negate the possibility of damage from ordinary wear or from causes other than the blasting.
The verdict with respect to causal relationship between the claimed negligence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.